Ep 41 - Is trauma an elite sport? with Tom Evens (LTC 2014)

High-Performance in Trauma Care: Lessons from Elite Sports Coaching Welcome to the St Emlyns blog! Today, we're diving into an insightful discussion from the recent London Trauma Conference, where Dr. Tom Evans shared his unique experiences and lessons learned from working with the British rowing team as a coach. Dr. Evans, a post-CCT doctor in emergency medicine and former Sydney HEMS doctor, offers a fascinating perspective on high-performance culture in trauma care, drawing parallels with elite sports coaching. The Challenge of High Performance in Trauma Care In trauma care, the term "world-class" is often used to describe top-tier performance. However, as Dr. Evans points out, this concept can be misleading. Unlike athletes who prepare for specific, well-defined events, emergency medicine professionals face an unpredictable array of cases daily. Thus, instead of striving to be "world-class," a more practical and applicable goal is to focus on achieving "high performance." High performance is not an end result but a continuous process. It involves creating a culture where every team member is committed to doing even the smallest tasks as well as possible. This mindset shift from an outcome-based to a process-oriented approach is crucial for trauma teams, as it emphasizes excellence in everyday practice rather than sporadic peak performances. High-Performance Culture: Key Components Shared Mental Models: One of the key aspects of high-performance teams, both in sports and healthcare, is the creation of shared mental models. In coaching, athletes need a clear understanding of what their performance should look like. This clarity helps them execute their skills effectively under pressure. Similarly, in trauma care, standard operating procedures (SOPs) help create a shared understanding among team members. This reduces cognitive load and allows team members to anticipate actions and outcomes, leading to better coordinated and more effective care. Simulation and Visualization: Dr. Evans emphasizes the importance of simulation and visualization in preparing for high-stress situations. Just as athletes use these techniques to mentally rehearse their performances, healthcare professionals can use simulation training to test and refine their responses to various scenarios. High-pressure simulations are particularly valuable as they help teams assess their readiness and make necessary adjustments to their mental models. Marginal Gains and the Basics: The concept of marginal gains—small incremental improvements—is widely recognized in elite sports. However, Dr. Evans cautions against focusing solely on these gains without first mastering the basics. In trauma care, the foundational elements such as knowledge, systems, and debriefing must be solid. Marginal gains can only be beneficial when the team operates consistently at a high level. Therefore, trauma teams should prioritize getting the basics right before seeking minor improvements. Training vs. Coaching: A Crucial Distinction A critical insight from Dr. Evans is the difference between training and coaching. In medical education, training often focuses on imparting knowledge and passing exams. However, coaching is about enhancing performance and preparing individuals for real-world challenges. Coaches are invested in their athletes' performance outcomes and see success as tied directly to their athletes' achievements. This personalized and performance-driven approach contrasts with the often fragmented nature of medical training, where trainees rotate through multiple trainers and institutions. Dr. Evans argues for a coaching approach in medical training. This would involve more personalized guidance and a focus on developing the skills and mindset needed for long-term success in the field. Such an approach could better prepare trainees for the unpredictable and high-stakes nature of trauma care. Implementing High-Performance Strategies in Trauma Teams To impleme