Ep 119 - September 2018 Round Up

  September Review: Key Insights from the Sentemlyns Podcast Welcome to the latest edition of the Sentemlyns podcast blog. I’m Simon Carly, and today we're diving into the significant papers and events from September. We're a tad late this month due to the bustling activities surrounding the Sentemlyns conference and the Teaching Court course, both of which were tremendous successes here in Manchester. Stay tuned as we delve into the highlights of September, from groundbreaking studies to enlightening conferences. Management of the Airway in Cardiac Arrest Key Studies by Ashley Levy We kick off with a comprehensive look at two pivotal papers by Ashley Levy, focusing on airway management in cardiac arrest. These studies, eagerly awaited by the medical community, provide critical insights into pre-hospital care. Airways 2 Study Published in JAMA in August, the Airways 2 study examined over 9,000 patients in the UK pre-hospital environment who suffered cardiac arrests. The study excluded patients who quickly returned to spontaneous circulation after a couple of shocks. The remaining patients were randomized into two groups: those receiving a supraglottic airway and those receiving an endotracheal tube. Findings: The study revealed no significant difference in outcomes between patients who received endotracheal intubation versus those with a supraglottic device. This challenges the long-held belief that intubation is superior in cardiac arrest scenarios. Implications: The findings suggest that in pre-hospital settings, the choice of airway device might be less critical than previously thought. It underscores the importance of managing ventilation effectively, regardless of the airway device used. For many practitioners, this means opting for the quickest and easiest airway device, typically a supraglottic airway. However, in prolonged or complex cases, converting to an endotracheal tube might still be preferable. Laryngeal Tube vs. Endotracheal Intubation in the US Study Another study published in JAMA, conducted in the US, compared endotracheal intubation with the use of a laryngeal tube. Similar to the Airways 2 study, it found no significant advantage to using an endotracheal tube. Interestingly, this study hinted at a slight benefit for the laryngeal tube, though this requires further investigation. Conclusion: Both studies indicate that for pre-hospital cardiac arrest, the priority should be securing an airway quickly and effectively. While supraglottic airways may suffice in many cases, endotracheal tubes remain a viable option in more complex scenarios. Global Health and Responsibility Stefan Brujins’ Perspective Stefan Brujins, a friend and colleague now working in the UK, provided a thought-provoking post on our responsibilities toward global health. Reflecting on his experiences growing up in South Africa, Stefan challenges us to reconsider our assumptions about equality and diversity in healthcare. He directs us to an impactful presentation by Annette Alenio at SMACC, emphasizing the need for togetherness in global health. This presentation is a must-watch for anyone interested in global health, offering valuable insights on how we can contribute more effectively to the global medical community. Highlights from the EUSEM Conference Diverse Learning Experiences The EUSEM conference, a combined event with the Royal College of Emergency Medicine, held in Glasgow, was a highlight of September. This event is renowned for its diversity and the unique learning opportunities it offers. Treatment of Massive PE by Dan Horner Dan Horner kicked off the conference with an insightful presentation on managing massive pulmonary embolism (PE). His update reflects the latest advancements and the complexities involved in clinical decision-making for thrombolysis in emergency settings. The emphasis on shared decision-making between clinicians and patients was particularly noteworthy. European Simulation Cup Victor